MELBOURNE—There were fireworks, flags, cookouts, costumes, and other sights and sounds of Australia Day all over downtown here this evening, but the fun never penetrated Rod Laver Arena. Victoria Azarenka’s 4-6, 6-4, 6-3 win over Li Na in the Aussie Open final was competitive, dramatic, and full of surprises, but it was played in one of the grimmest spirits I can remember for a Grand Slam final.
Azarenka, cast as the villain after her Medical Timeout Scorned Around the World, walked on to scattered boos and a vague, floating disdain. The Australian crowd didn’t seem to know exactly what to do with Vika, but they certainly weren’t going to root for her. Four minutes into the match, someone yelled, “Please be quiet, Azarenka!” A little later, another, slightly wittier heckler called, “Take a deep breath, Vicky.” In one corner of the arena, a man held up a sign that read, “Cheaterenka.” It wasn’t a warm welcome, but at least Vika wasn’t in Paris, where the locals really know how to drive a pariah off a tennis court. As she said after the match, “I was expecting way worse.”
You would have thought that the beneficiary of this relative ill will would have been Azarenka’s opponent, Li, who went from being a well-liked comedienne to an adopted daughter of Australia (Aussie Na?) simply by standing on the other side of the net from Vika. Unfortunately, Li couldn’t seem to remain standing for long. Down 1-3 in the second set, she turned her ankle and had to get it taped. Scarier was her fall at 2-1 in the third set, on the first point after play had been suspended for a fireworks display, when she turned her ankle again and hit her head, hard, on the cement. She said later that, “for two seconds I couldn’t see anything.”
Not that Li couldn’t find a laugh in it. Afterward, asked why she had fallen, she yelled in mock exasperation, “Because I’m stupid!!!”
For the majority of its three sets, the match was scratchy, nervy, and mistake-prone. Only in the last half of the third did the rallies begin to find a spark. There were 16 breaks of serve in 29 games. Azarenka made 28 unforced errors against 18 winners; Li was significantly worse, with 57 errors and 36 winners. But what cost Li—aside, of course, from the falls on court—was the timing of those errors.
All week we had heard about Li's improved mental state, about how she was more mature and relaxed on court. And mostly she was. But as in 2011 here, when it came time to close out a Grand Slam final, Li couldn’t do it. In the second set, she fought back from 0-3 to 4-4, only to botch an overhead, put an easy backhand in the net, and lose her serve. Up 2-1 in the third set, she squandered a break point. Down 3-4, she earned another break point, only to pull up nervously on a backhand return and sail it long. Li played well, until she had to play well.
When it was over, she sat and cried. And you could understand why. Since 2006, no woman who has won the first set of a Grand Slam final has gone on to lose it except for her, both times at the Australian Open, in 2011 and 2013. By the time she reached the interview room, though, she had gathered herself.
“After the match I was sad because I lose the match,” Li said. “But after I cool down I was feeling happy about my tennis, because right now I still play well on the court.”
She even dipped into recent tennis history to find a bright side, citing the examples of Ana Ivanovic in 2008 and Maria Sharapova last year as players who lost the final in Melbourne and went on to win the French Open five months later. Li should know that it's possible: She did the same thing herself two years ago.