Internazionali-bnl-italia-2011-foro-italico

Last Thursday morning, while I was drinking coffee and two tennis players, Florian Mayer and Juan Ignacio Chela, were traipsing groggily around a hot-looking clay court on the TV, church bells started to ring down the street. I live in an Italian neighborhood in Brooklyn, around the corner from the Moonstruck bakery and not too far from the docks where Last Exit to Brooklyn was filmed. The bells ring all the time here, from the area’s many half grand, half decrepit old churches, one of which Tony Soprano nearly had a heart attack in a few years ago. They ring for reasons that often escape me. Thursday morning they began at 8:00 A.M. on the dot, but they tolled many more than eight times; someone seemed to be ringing them just for the sake of the sound, a sound that makes me feel as if nothing can possibly go wrong that morning (even if I know better). After a few minutes, I began to feel like I was in yet another movie featuring an Italian-American: Rocky. Or was it Rocky III? Tough to tell.

Time is on my mind at this time of year, as it is every May. I had a birthday recently, but even as I added year, life returned like new to the trees and the streets around me. The world doesn’t age, it starts over.

If there’s one tournament that follows suit, it’s Rome. Whatever name it has in a given year—Italian Open is still the way I like to think of it—and whatever new arenas are erected and renovations made to the Foro Italico, it’s still defined by those kitschy Fascist classical statues that stand guard around the courts. They may have been built in the 20th century, but they look eternal enough for the Eternal City. And, by the way, that has to be the best nickname for any location on earth. You can have your City of Light, your City of Brotherly Love, your City of Broad Shoulders, your City of Angels: Rome outlives them.

The name has felt a little more resonant to me this year. As I said, my birthday came at the start of the month, but even without that as a reminder, I’d been thinking, apropos of I’m not sure what, about how differently we experience time as we get older—or at least how differently I experience it. The spark came from reading a line by Updike that he wrote in his 70s, as he looked back on his brief, between-marriage bachelor days in Boston 35 years earlier:

I lived in Boston once, a year or two, in furtive semi-bachelorhood.
I parked a Karmann Ghia in Back Bay’s shady spots, but I was lighter then, and lived as if within forever.

(Speaking of which, there’s a vintage purplish Karmann Ghia that keeps popping up in my neighborhood, like an old friend you see now and then, or a person from the hood who you don’t know but you think you would like to meet. Very cool looking bug of a car. What happened to cars, anyway; why don’t they look like that anymore? In 30 years, will I stop and admire a Toyota Yaris the way I do the long white ’65 Impala with the pale-blue interior that often sits a few blocks away from my apartment. I was inspecting it one afternoon, as I always do when I see it, when I heard someone behind me say, in a gravelly Brooklyn accent, “You like that?” It was the owner, standing in his doorway, smoking a cigar, smiling. “Pretty nice, eh?”)

“Within forever”: It describes how I felt, or how I think I felt, when I was in my teens and 20s. There was no end to time then; there was no such thing as “wasting it,” wasting it was the point. On summer vacations to the Jersey Shore I liked to lie on the couch in the small back TV room at my grandmother’s house doing nothing more than staring out the window at the big water tank on the horizon, watching it go in and out of focus in the heat. The couch was extremely itchy, but I liked it better that way, I liked the discomfort—I had time for discomfort, they way I once had time for free jazz. At home, on quiet days away from school with nothing to do, I liked to lie upside-down off the living room couch and stare at the opposite wall until the books on the shelves completely blurred together. Then I would close my eyes and start over.

Advertising

Volkswagen-karmann-ghia

Volkswagen-karmann-ghia

That sense of timelessness carried over into college and beyond, more social but essentially unchanged. Friends and I could spend weekend days watching the French Open or the NFL or Mr. Belvedere, lying flat out on couches in the dorm common room and talking nonsense. A hangover might put you out for entire day, or force you to spend a sunny afternoon inside watching the most brain-dead TV you could find, but that was part of the deal, part of the fun.

No more. Twenty years after college, deep into the 9 to 5 (10 to 6 in the magazine world), I don’t live within forever. There feels like there’s no time to waste, even on weekends, and there’s nothing more frustrating than a hangover, especially when you’re trying to beat a tennis rival. Time feels narrower, finite, vanishing, moving too fast, there to be used. And I’m not flexible enough to sit upside down anymore.

I miss forever, because wasting time is the same as freedom—the only one? I’ve had a glimpse of it again recently, too short to be satisfying but long enough to make me realize it could still exist. In the last year or so, I’ve been able to write from home when I want to. I used to hate taking single days off during the week because I wasn’t used to them. I had no routine in place for them, the way I did for normal work days and weekends. I had no way to occupy my mind, which generally leads to disaster after about three hours. But working from home is different. After writing a post or column or article—maybe just a couple of words—by the early afternoon, I’ll take a walk in the neighborhood, unwound and buoyed by the satisfaction of having finished something. In the sift of leaves and strollers, bookstore clerks and landscapers, handsome brownstones and cracked sidewalks, in the particular gleam of sunlight on a car hood at a certain time of day, I can feel forever again for a few minutes. In this residential area on a weekday afternoon, nothing seems to be going anywhere with any purpose. Time, for once, has no point; you can waste it if you want. You can look at the magnolia, blooming for a few weeks in May, on the corner. You can inspect every inch of the stone under your feet. You can imagine what the people around you are up to or off to as they waste their own time. You can hear a bird chirp.

But after a few spins around those streets, I start to think of what I still have to do that day, that I haven’t had lunch, that I have a headache and need an aspirin, that the laundry isn’t done, that I’m too old to learn French, that I walk with my shoulders hunched, that I have the wrong jacket on and I'm starting to sweat. I pick up the pace and get home quickly, firmly back in time’s grip.

Last week I ended up back in front of the TV, watching tennis from the Eternal City. The tournament in Rome represents both versions of time—the endless one going straight forward, and the seasonal one, which starts fresh every spring. They counter each other, and we live in both. Most sports are seasonal—baseball comes with spring and has an innocent quality, football comes in fall, when the world gets back to business. Rome represents a tennis circuit that once followed the seasons, and followed the sun, from London to Melbourne. But the sport doesn’t do that anymore. There are no seasons in tennis now; it’s eternal and endless. In general, I think this is a negative. It flattens the game, and reduces the significance of any one tournament and victory.

But there’s an upside I can appreciate as well. I can’t think of any other place in life outside of tennis where you can say: “there’s always another day.” When a pro loses, there really is always another match around the corner. And that’s how the best players think of it. I’ve heard Jimmy Connors say a lot of things over the years, but only one of hi statements pops up in my head with any regularity. At Wimbledon in 2005, Connors was a guest commentator for the BBC. He announced a match between someone and Sebastien Grosjean. The Frenchman’s opponent had never lost to him, and Connors’ booth mate made some noises about how hopeless it must seem for him. Connors' response was simple and positive, like a champ's should be: “It’s a new day.”

Maybe the tennis way is the best way to look at time. I don’t live within forever anymore, but there’s always another day.