Robert Lansdorp, Maria Sharapova’s coach during much of her formative years, once jokingly called her “Queen Maria.” Though still just a teenager when Lansdorp made that comment, Sharapova by then had already won Wimbledon.
That was the first of many starburst-like moments that made her career less regal procession, more rough-and-tumble crusade—one that would culminate with Sharapova’s induction into the International Tennis Hall of Fame.
For this was royalty earned, the result of Sharapova’s strong work ethic and sheer competitive will. The Wimbledon win had happened at 17 in 2004, the US Open at 19, the Australian Open at 20. Four years later, after suffering a debilitating shoulder injury that triggered a drop out of the Top 100, Sharapova reinvented herself well enough to regain the No. 1 ranking, win two singles titles at Roland Garros, and become one of only 10 women in tennis history to earn singles victories at all four majors.
👉 Read More: Maria Sharapova’s election to the Hall of Fame may be polarizing, but it’s deserved
Ironically, the commercialization of Sharapova’s success created a veneer that obscured the remarkable journey she had taken to reach that point. In the spirit of not confusing advertising with editorial, Sharapova wrote her autobiography in 2017, well after she’d won all five of her majors. Speaking to the New York Times upon publication, she said, “Your mother was pregnant with you when the Chernobyl reactor blew up, only 30 kilometers away? You were spotted by Martina Navratilova at age 6? You father convinced a U.S. immigration officer to give him a visa to bring his 6 ½-year-old daughter to the United States to become a tennis player?”