!Afandab2By TennisWorld Contributing Editor Andrew Burton
Morning, all.
Well, was that fun last night?
James Blake and Rafael Nadal clearly studied the playbooks Andrew Friedman and I set out for them, and played one of the matches of the tournament. Out of 173 points played, Blake took 86 and Nadal 87 ("What was Nadal like from the free throw line?" asked Joel Drucker). Now, of course, the actual number of points won in a match matters as much as the popular vote in a Presidential contest or primary race - we have another scoring system to deal with.
And no score, points tally, statistic or equation could adequately the way Nadal stepped up at the end of the match. Early in the third set, I muttered to Andrew Friedman and Elizabeth Kaye, a writer/journalist who's an honarary member of the RNKAS, that it was one of those matches that you don't want either player to lose. And happily, neither player did lose - Blake didn't lose, Nadal won. There are times when you're playing well, and all of a sudden, your opponent lifts his own level, and tekes it from you. So you say "well played, opponent," and move on.
Today is a big day for me, so this early CC/Scouting Report is going to be a bit briefer than most. Andrew Friedman and I did battle at the hotel tennis court at 8:15am. The set we played resembled Nadal-Tsonga, as we swapped breaks in the first two games (truth in advertising - any comparison between our play and that of Nadal and Tsonga probably ought to stop there.)