(Ed. note: TennisWorld's Spiritual Advisor Miguel Seabra is blogging - and bringing it to the Tribe, big-time! - from Shanghai. Here is the master of the forehand drop shot's de-construction of today's action - PB)
Roger Federer vs. Andy Roddick: It was a great duel today here at the Qi Zhong Stadium, but I'll get back to it after we do a little rewinding.
I mentioned yesterday I had a rough arrival. What I didn’t mention was I had the biggest scare: Chinese custom authorities stopped me at the airport and made me open my backpack; they wanted to arrest me – and I thought I would rot in a cell in the middle of nowhere. What they saw in my backpack made them go crazy: dozens of rubber, string dampeners in the form of the classic, black- and-white symbol of the Yin and the Yang - an icon that represents and epitomizes the notion of perfect balance. I was told, “You can’t bring those Chinese symbols from Europe to China. It’s a sacrilege, a cultural sin. You’re going in.”
I saw my life pass before my eyes in a flash and screamed: “No, no – it was Nadia Petrova who put those things in there!”
Wait… Nadia Petrova? She won’t be playing in Shanghai! And since when I understand Chinese?
Then I. . . woke up. Although I only slept for a few minutes during the flight, I managed to have a strange dream. I guess it was the traumatic experience of having commentated on last week’s WTA Championships in Madrid. There, I watched Petrova start with a strong, solid performance against Amélie Mauresmo, then lapse to a horrible frame of mind in back-to-back losses to Martina Hingis and Justine Hénin-Hardenne. Nadia melted down, couldn’t think properly, and completely lost her equilibrium – despite the miniature Yin/Yang dampener in her strings.
Balance – it's the magical word. Everyone has his or her own balance, and everyone's is different. Federer has his own balance, too. In his match with Marat Safin in Rome, Federer started out making a fool of himself. He ranted and threw racquets. But he abruptly seemed to decide: “No more of that” (Safin did not watch that tape, apparently). Fed is a player who has learned how to stave off panic. Part of that learning process occurred in his losses to Nalbandian.
As he explained, “I would think ‘Oh, I don’t know what to do, I don’t have the key, maybe from the baseline I’m not good enough, my serve is not powerful enough’ and so forth. I would ask all sorts of questions. I would start serve and volleying him, chip-and-charging him, everything. Thank God I don’t need that anymore; through my mental and physical strength, I was able to overcome all these problems – now, I just hang in there and hope for the best. It’s been the best choice that I’ve ever taken in tennis”.
He elaborated on the role experience played in helping him overcome panic:
“Losing and winning a lot of matches, just playing against all sorts of different players. You always have the fast runners, the big servers, the serve-and-volleyers, the aggressive baseliners, the counter-punchers. I think at the beginning of your career all you’re trying to get is a feel for how to play each and every one of them. It’s obvious that you like one style of play. But to beat all the different styles, I think that’s the hard part. . . . You have to overcome all these different obstacles if you want to be a great player. . . it took me a long time, but eventually I got a hold of myself, and a hold of their games”.
Now there's a player in balance.