MELBOURNE—That wasn’t a bad effort from Andy Murray, right? He made his third straight Grand Slam final, and fourth straight at a major event. He beat Roger Federer for the first time at one of these things, in as convincing a five-setter as you’re likely to see. And, as the Daily Mail put it back home in the U.K., he made a strong claim to being the second best tennis player in the world at the moment, behind only the “great Djokovic.”
But if you thought that would give Muzz any satisfaction, you would be wrong, very wrong, according to the Mail. It only makes things far worse.
MURRAY’S REAL AGONY IS FALLING JUST SHORT OF TRULY GREAT DJOKOVIC
“Andy Murray is the second best tennis player in the world," Martin Samuel writes. "Bummer. Turns out second, which must have looked so appealing when he was fourth, and then third, is still a pretty frustrating place to be.
"More so, probably, because now Murray gets to stand next to more trophies, but without being permitted to touch; he gets to give speeches, as the warm-up act for the winner. He gets to be very polite to everybody and have everybody be polite about him. ‘You put up a good fight, you played your part in a great match. Let’s have a big hand for Andy.’ At that moment, second must suck way more than, say, 14th.”
There you have it—the better you do, the worse off your feel. Why didn’t anyone warn Murray about this years ago? He might have done the smart thing and studied marketing instead.
Anyway, its good to have Muzz the loser to kick around again, isn’t it? Here’s what else the world press is saying about Murray, Djoker, and Vika, among other people, the day after the Aussie Open.