NEW YORK—Jelena Jankovic isn’t happy. She throws her hand in the air and grumbles in Serbian toward the corner of the bleachers on little Court 4 here. It’s not clear if she knows anyone in that section, or if she just needs a place to aim her complaints. It’s also not clear what’s bothering Jankovic at the moment. I don't say that because she’s speaking a language that few here understand. I say that because she’s just won the previous point.
That’s JJ being JJ: She has to vent, even if she’s winning. Maybe even especially if she’s winning. As every tennis player knows, success doesn’t make you happy, it only makes you anxious. Most players get angry because they’ve missed a shot. Sometimes, with Jankovic, I suspect that she’s missed the shot so she can give herself a chance to get angry.
After getting her feet tangled up and sending a forehand long today, she searches for her brother (and coach) Marko in the stands. When she finds him, she lashes out with some more grumbly Serbian; it sounds as if the court surface isn’t to her liking at the moment. Marko takes it all in with a half smile, and gives her an encouraging word back. Mollified for the moment, she settles down and heads back to the baseline. It used to be her mother, Snezana, who took the brunt of her abuse, but Marko has filled in so nicely far this year. The change had been good for the Jankovic family.
Marko started coaching Jelena at the Bogota event in February. She won that tournament and has seen her ranking rise back up to No. 12 after reaching the final in Charleston, the semis in Miami and Cincinnati, and the quarters at the French Open. The former No. 1, who has always played as many tournaments as humanly possible, already has more wins this season than she did in all of 2012, when injuries and burnout sent out her out of the Top 20 for the first time since 2005.
“I just tried to stay strong, and I changed up a few things,” Jankovic toldUSA Today last week when asked about her mini-resurgence. “Now I really enjoy training, and I’m pretty healthy. We’ll see—so far, so good.”
Whatever you do, don’t call the 28-year-old Jankovic a veteran—she hates that. But she did look the part of the roughed-up road warrior at the Open on Thursday; there was tape up and down her legs. There was nothing wrong with JJ’s game, though. She may not be as fast she was when she was in the Top 5, but you wouldn’t know it from the way she moves. Jankovic is one of those players whose athleticism needs to be seen live and up close to be appreciated; she’s more dynamic than you might think on TV, fun to watch for her instinctive movement alone. She looks light as she rolls her shoulders forward and goes after a ball; as she leaps back for a forehand; as she leans into one her trademark down-the-line backhands; as she darts her way to the net.
That's right, to the net. Jankovic has made an effort to get there more often this year—with her quickness and court sense, she should be a natural. With that in mind, she started playing doubles in earnest in 2013, and she says that it has helped in her attempt to add a dimension to her game.
“Adding a dimension” is not something we expect from the pros these days; they mostly dance with what brung them. I didn’t expect much from Jankovic this year, either. After 2012 and her 28th birthday, it seemed that a decade of non-stop play and travel had finally taken their toll, and that the women’s game had begun to pass her by. It’s nice to be wrong, and to see her flying around the court again. She won easily today, 6-3, 6-2—despite her best efforts, even JJ couldn’t find a way to get irritated—and her draw looks OK-bordering-on-promising. She’ll play Kurumi Nara next, and after that the winner of Li Na and Laura Robson.
The crowd in New York, which remembers JJ from her run to the final here five years ago, was happy to see her again, too, even if she was out on Court 4 rather than in Ashe. “C’mon Jelena!” they called. After someone told her to “concentrate,” Jankovic looked in the direction of the perpetrator and threw her hand in the air in annoyance—“Easy for you to say,” was the message. But no one seemed offended. We knew it was just JJ being JJ.