MELBOURNE—When was the last time that one tour was dominated to the extent that Serena Williams is dominating, both as player and personality, the WTA right now? I think you have to go back to Roger Federer’s three-Slam 2004, the year before Rafael Nadal staked out his own slice of ATP turf. Over the last two years, Serena has turned a viable Big 3 into a monarchical Big 1, and never allowed anyone to seriously claim to be her rival. There’s no one right now whom we can mention with Serena.
This may not be ideal for producing classic Grand Slam finals, but it does make it exciting when Serena is challenged. It’s hard to think of two matches on either tour last year that were as riveting, dramatically, as the ones she lost to Sloane Stephens in Australia and Sabine Lisicki at Wimbledon. And when Serena does come through and win, we have the satisfaction of seeing something that feels meant to be, that feels right.
In short, when you talk about women’s tennis these days, you can’t mention anyone—not Maria, not Vika, not Li Na—without mentioning Serena first. And you can’t preview a women’s major without first making the obligatory caveat that “if Serena plays her best, she’ll win.” But that doesn’t mean any tournament, and especially any pressure-packed tournament, is a mortal lock for her.
Which will we see at the Australian Open, the logic of a Williams win, or the shock of a Williams loss? Either way, it will be the decisive match of the tournament. Let’s see what the draw has to say.