Today my fellow editor Richard Pagliaro and I talk about February tennis—what are its underrated pleasures, and how much does it mean down the road?
**
Richard,
Even though most of the top players are involved, or will be involved soon, February still has the feel of a lull in the season, doesn't it? Last year I seem to remember it differently, but maybe that was just because Rafael Nadal was making his comeback at this time of year. I know the end of the season is knocked as a sleepy time in tennis, but this month has given it a run for its money.
What, if anything, can we read into the results over the last few weeks? Titles have been won by Berdych, Nishikori, Halep, Ferrer, Pavlyuchenkova, Cilic, Monfils. Do we see them winning at the big U.S events next month? February is two steps removed from the game's most important events—next are the March Masters/Premier tournaments, and after that, still three months away, are the majors. It's hard to imagine anyone sustaining their momentum all that time. If the tours' schedules were done with a little more logic in mind, the pro might be in Australia now, playing in the warm-up events for Melbourne, and we wouldn’t this in-between time.
Yet there are things I like about tennis in this month. The stakes are lower, and so the chatter around the game doesn't get (quite) as heated. I like getting a glimpse of what players outside the Top 5—Berdych, Monfils, Halep—can do when they don't have to face the Nadals and Serenas of the world. And I like the atmosphere, through the TV, of the South American events at night. There's a mellow festive feel to all of them that makes me wish I were there. For that reason alone, I’m glad that Rio has been added to the tour.
What do you think, Richard? What do you get out of this time of year?