Miami: Li d. Keys

by: Peter Bodo | March 23, 2014

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Email
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Email

AP Photo

MIAMI, Fla.—Thirty-two-year-old Li Na knows what it’s like to be 19-year-old Madison Keys, and she’d just as soon not have anything to do with it anymore. But today she was happy to revisit that age and the state of Keys’ development after a series of impressive escapes left the world No. 2 a 7-6 (3), 6-3 winner in their third-round match today.

“I think when I was same age like her—I think she's much, much better than me,” Li said afterward.

“You know, Americans have a long history about tennis. So she was learn tennis in America, so they have high, how do you say, high goal(s). . .  They have so many tennis star in America. So they looking forward for No. 1 in the world.”

It’s a good point, this difference in the baseline of expectations, but it’s still also true that there’s a great difference between playing a good match and winning a good match. That’s the part that even the distinguished honor roll of American tennis champions cannot help a young player like Keys master.

Keys had two more break points in this match than did Li (12-10), but she converted one fewer (four to Li’s five). Ultimately that spelled the major difference.

The two women had met twice before, last year, with Li winning in three sets on a hard court in Sydney. But Keys caught Li napping in Madrid on clay, and won with surprising ease, 6-3, 6-2. And Keys has undoubtedly gotten better in the interim. She looks both slimmer and stronger—changes that did not go unnoticed by Li. All that helps explain how Keys recovered from a 1-3 deficit to find herself serving for the first set at 5-3, eventually earning three set points.

Li wiped away the first of those landmines with her money shot, the down-the-line backhand. She survived the second set point by smacking a forehand winner to get to deuce. But Li saw a break-point chance come and quickly go when Keys blasted a serve past her forehand. Another winning serve gave Keys another set point—and that’s where the youngster made her critical mistake.

It was a double fault, and it probably cost Keys three points: The original, set point; the distracted, ensuing point, when she drilled a forehand into the net; and Li’s subsequent break point, when Keys erred on a down-the-line backhand. That yielded the break that kept Li’s hopes alive.

“I think she play well. . . During that time (Keys’ resurgence) I didn't think about too much. I say, ‘Okay, try to hit the ball, try to do what you have to do,’ and I think saving the set points was give me. . . not a lot (of help), but at least I was still on the first set.”

Li sensed a slight decline in Keys’ game after that, but “slight” was the operative word, as the tiebreaker demonstrated. Keys lost the first point when her inside-out forehand flew just out. After that mini-break, though, both women played sharp, probing tennis, with no more breaks of serve until Li cracked Keys a second time to take an insurmountable lead.

Keys gathered herself and remained competitive. She broke Li in the first game of the second set, and after a quick hold she pinned Li down with three more break points in the third game. A two-break lead at that point probably would have cost Li the set, but she ducked the threat the hard way: She hit a winner and a pair of unreturned serves, one off each wing, and ended up holding when Keys couldn’t handle her serve at either deuce or advantage.

Boosted by the escape, Li broke Keys in the next game for 2-2. The key shot was an uncertain backhand hybrid of slice and drop shot that Keys tried off a Li serve return. Li broke Keys again at her next opportunity, and from 4-2 she cruised over the finish line.

Thinking back to that hybrid backhand that provided Li with her decisive break, it’s hard to dismiss a comment the Australian Open champ later made (although she was waxing philosophical about life in general) when I asked her if it wasn’t a little boring to be older, a veteran.

“When young you like to try like every like new thing,” she said. “But if (when) you already know what happen, you say, ‘Okay, enough.’ For me is very tough to be in the, like, same situation like before.”

Situations like the one Keys found herself in today are still relatively new to her, and this certainly will be a learning experience for her.

“She’s No. 2 in the world for a reason,” Keys said. “She just won Australian Open for a reason. She's a great player. You know, I played well at times, and she just played the bigger points, you know, really, really well. So, I mean, there is a lot to be happy with, but there is also some stuff I need to work on. That's what I'm going to go do.”

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Email

More Stories

In Rome, Nadal and Djokovic reminded us what Big 4 tennis is all about

Rafa and Nole have played more than any other male pair of the Open Era.

Projecting Paris: The men's and women's seeds at the French Open

With Rome in the rearview mirror, we now turn to Roland Garros.

Rome: Nadal tops Zverev to regain No. 1; Svitolina routs No. 1 Halep

Halep was treated by a trainer for an apparent back problem.