As was the case with just about everyone who witnessed his performance on Sunday afternoon in a second-round loss to Taro Daniel, I was watching a Novak Djokovic who was almost unrecognizable. He never found his range off the ground. His timing was abysmal. His incomparable two-handed backhand—the best in the sport across the last decade—was alarmingly off. His serve was discombobulated. And, most surprisingly, his customary fighting spirit was missing. In the final set of this Indian Wells showdown, Djokovic was so disconsolate that he hardly seemed to be giving himself a chance; it was as if, for whatever the reasons, he did not want to win.
To be sure, Djokovic’s 7-6 (3), 4-6, 6-1 setback against the Japanese qualifier was disheartening for the wide range of ardent admirers who have long believed in the Serbian as a champion of the highest order. They were surely astonished by his passivity on a surreal afternoon at a tournament he has won no fewer than five times, in a setting he has always celebrated, on a surface that suits his game like no other. They must have been dismayed by his uncharacteristic lack of swagger, and his timidity in the latter stages of a desultory effort.
And yet, while making no excuses for this prideful individual who detests losing and demands an awful lot from himself, it would be foolhardy to read too much into what happened to Djokovic at Indian Wells. He had not played a match since falling in the fourth round of the Australian Open against an inspired Hyeon Chung. He had been gone from the game for six months leading up to the proceedings in Melbourne, sidelined by an ailing elbow since Wimbledon in 2017. The elbow troubled Djokovic again at the 2018 Australian Open, and undoubtedly contributed to his demise on its hard courts.
Think about it: out of the game for six months, back for one tournament, injured again, going through a surgical procedure for the elbow, and then returning to work at Indian Wells with no decent preparation. That is not a recipe for success. My feeling is that Djokovic has been so frustrated by his inactivity on the court that he came back too soon in California. He yearned to perform again on a big stage, to remind himself how it feels to play the game as only he can, to return to his office and release some more magic.
That may have been a mistake. He was clearly not ready. In the early stages, however, he was striking the ball cleanly and serving adequately despite his awkward, abbreviated motion. Djokovic should have won the first set comfortably. He moved swiftly into a 5-2 lead. In the eighth game, he missed an easy forehand down the line at set point. After the industrious Daniel escaped and held on for 3-5, Djokovic wasted a 30-0 lead when serving for the set. At deuce, a weakly-directed smash was answered aggressively by Daniel, who drove a forehand down-the-line pass with interest to take the point.
Tennis Channel Live discusses Novak Djokovic at Indian Wells: